martedì 5 gennaio 2016

# s-acad: the worst piece of peer review ever received

<< should post-publication peer review be anonymous? >>

<< merits and pitfalls of anonymity in peer review >>

<< The PubPeer organisers and two other scholars debate the merits and pitfalls of anonymity in peer review >>

December 10, 2015

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/should-post-publication-peer-review-be-anonymous

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento

Nota. Solo i membri di questo blog possono postare un commento.