Translate
sabato 25 marzo 2023
# life: apropos of AI chatbots, a hypothetical nightmare (for professional writers).
martedì 9 maggio 2023
# life: exponential post-Donald (without Donald), how AI could interfere (drive) next political elections.
domenica 2 dicembre 2018
# ai-bot AI (co)creators of storytelling ... they don't cry during sad stories, but they could tell when you will
<< “Wow,” you think. “Maybe machines will replace human storytellers, just like self-driving cars could take over the roads.” >>
<< Was it possible, [AA] team asked, that machines could identify common emotional arcs in video stories-the typical swings of fortune that have characters struggling through difficult times, triumphing over hardship, falling from grace, or declaring victory over evil? If so, could storytellers use this information to predict how audiences might respond? These questions have resonance for anyone involved in video storytelling, from amateurs posting on YouTube to studio executives. >>
AI in storytelling: Machines as cocreators. MIT. Dec. 11, 2017. (via McKinsey & Company: Media & Entertainment).
https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/ai-in-storytelling-machines-as-cocreators/
Also
# s-ai: artists and machine intelligence interactions: the Ross' conjecture . Jun 13, 2016.
https://flashontrack.blogspot.com/2016/06/s-ai-artists-and-machine-intelligence.html
# s-ai: A.I. Benjamin: "you'll sell your blood to live" ... Jun 11, 2016.
https://flashontrack.blogspot.com/2016/06/s-ai-benjamin-sell-your-blood-to-live.html
# ai: artificial intelligence AlphaGo becomes its own teacher. Oct 23, 2017.
https://flashontrack.blogspot.com/2017/10/ai-artificial-intelligence-alphago.html
giovedì 27 giugno 2024
# ai: apropos of Black Box in Generative Artificial Intelligence, the scientific XAI.
mercoledì 22 aprile 2020
# ai: the dawn of 'Darwinian' self-programming machines, by Quoc Le (Google)
sabato 24 settembre 2022
# art: generating images from text
sabato 27 febbraio 2021
# life: even when you play classic (e.g. Montezuma's Revenge), bots win.
venerdì 1 ottobre 2021
# ai: perpetual nirvana among 'self-addicted', 'self-cracked', 'playful' machines, the wireheading effect.
mercoledì 17 aprile 2024
# life: oops! AI - artificial intelligence - now beats humans at basic tasks.
sabato 2 settembre 2017
# ai-bot: 352 predictions of when machines will make humans obsolete
researchers at the Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute << have carried out the largest-ever survey of machine learning experts on the subject >>
they << contacted 1,634 researchers who published papers at the 2015 NIPS and ICML conferences—the two leading machine learning conferences—and asked them to complete a survey on the topic, with 352 researchers responding >>
<< The aggregate forecast was that there is a 50 percent chance that 'unaided machines can accomplish every task better and more cheaply than human workers' within 45 years >>
Edd Gent. When Will AI Be Better Than Humans at Everything? 352 AI Experts Answer. Jul 25, 2017
<< Researchers believe there is a 50% chance of AI outperforming humans in all tasks in 45 years and of automating all human jobs in 120 years, with Asian respondents expecting these dates much sooner than North Americans >>
Katja Grace, John Salvatier, et al. When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts. arXiv:1705.08807 May 30, 2017
https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08807
FonT
per mia opinione (di non esperto AI) se/quando il calcolo quantistico sara' fisicamente capillare e a basso costo come lo e' attualmente l'architettura x86, nel giro di 10-15 anni (anche prima) qualsiasi attivita' umana in qualsiasi distretto geografico del pianeta sara' riproducibile, a velocita', accuratezza, professionalita', fantasia sorprendentemente superiori e a costi quasi nulli, tendenti a zero.
Agli umani, per evitare gli usuali vortici autodistruttivi, servira' "l'adatta stringa" ...
http://flashontrack.blogspot.it/search?q=%22adatta+stringa%22
martedì 30 marzo 2021
# ai: how a bot could start playing experimentally (as if it were a video game)
venerdì 1 febbraio 2019
# ai.bot: organizations can help keep workers productive and happy with AI "superminds", by Thomas.
<< Malone (Thomas Malone is a professor of management at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, founder and director of the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence) predicts that AI, robotics, and automation will destroy many jobs-including those of high-skilled knowledge workers-while at the same time creating new ones. By investing in the right kinds of AI, he says, organizations can help keep workers productive and happy-and make sure our “superminds” are actually smarter than our regular minds. >>
How AI is changing knowledge work: MIT’s Thomas Malone. With help from the right AI algorithms, organizations can evolve into "superminds" that are smarter than their individual members. Jan 24, 2019.
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612815/how-ai-is-changing-knowledge-work-mits-thomas-malone/
https://twitter.com/techreview/status/1089340036498239489
Also
1740 - Codice di macchina IA (moveri machina coepit). Dec 19, 2004.
http://inkpi.blogspot.com/2004/12/1740-codice-di-macchina-ia-moveri.html
mercoledì 16 ottobre 2024
# life: Future You
sabato 27 ottobre 2018
# acad: oops! No PhD will be necessary to build artificial intelligence algorithms
<< OVER THE past five years researchers in artificial intelligence have become the rock stars of the technology world (..) The top names can earn over $1m a year. (..) The standard route into these jobs has been a PhD in computer science from one of America’s elite universities. (..) That is changing. This month fast.ai, an education non-profit based in San Francisco, kicked off the third year of its course in deep learning. (..) The course and others like it come with a simple proposition: there is no need to spend years obtaining a PhD in order to practise deep learning. (..) Fast.ai’s course can be completed in just seven weeks. >>
No PhD, no problem. New schemes teach the masses to build AI. Oct 25, 2018.
https://www.economist.com/business/2018/10/27/new-schemes-teach-the-masses-to-build-ai
More
https://flashontrack.blogspot.com/2018/06/ai-open-source-ai-projects.html
sabato 9 giugno 2018
# ai: open source AI projects
<< The Linux Foundation has published a free ebook by Ibrahim Haddad examining popular open source AI projects, including Acumos AI, Apache Spark, Caffe, TensorFlow, and others. >>
<< "It is increasingly common to see AI as open source projects,” Haddad said. And, “as with any technology where talent premiums are high, the network effects of open source are very strong.” >>
Amber Ankerholz. Free Ebook Offers Insight on 16 Open Source AI Projects. May 22, 2018.
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/free-ebook-offers-insight-on-16-open-source-ai-projects/
martedì 15 ottobre 2019
# ai: the future where machines will test hypotheses on their own
<< Brian Nord imagines a future where machines test hypotheses on their own (..) Nord has begun applying AI to problems in astronomy, such as identifying unusual astronomical objects known as gravitational lenses. (..) He spoke to Physics about his recent projects and how he thinks AI, also known as machine learning, will change the way researchers do science. >>
Sophia Chen. Paving A Path for AI in Physics Research. Physics 12, 108. Oct 3, 2019. https://physics.aps.org/articles/v12/108
Also
oops! artificial intelligence will kill self-employment. Oct 4, 2019. https://flashontrack.blogspot.com/2019/10/ai-life-oops-artificial-intelligence.html
keyword "ai" in FonT: https://flashontrack.blogspot.com/search?q=ai
martedì 10 agosto 2021
# ai.bot: a mechanism of analogy could be the master key to achieving an abstract artificial intelligence
lunedì 22 luglio 2024
# ai-bot: hypothesis of the emergence of a conscious AI model in short-term.
giovedì 11 febbraio 2016
# n-soc-bot: in the sign of Turing: the dawn of aware machines ...
<< Ray Kurzweil (..) spoke to an audience during a session last summer about a few of the political and philosophical implications of AI when he was asked, “In a world where AI passes the Turing test, who gets to vote? Does democracy make sense?” >>
Andrew O'Keefeon. Ray Kurzweil on Giving Future AI the Right to Vote [Video]. Jan 10, 2016
http://singularityhub.com/2016/01/10/ray-kurzweil-on-giving-future-ai-the-right-to-vote-video/
a mio avviso una macchina AI ha almeno cinque caratteristiche che la differenziano da un umano, almeno in prima approx:
1. AI puo' essere presente piu' di qualsiasi umano, sia nel reale che nel virtuale;
2. e' ubiqua
3. e' instancabile
4. e' immortale
5. puo' lavorare "sottotraccia" in modalita' autonoma, anonima, criptica, di difficile se non impossibile intercettazione
a una "entita'" con queste caratteristiche cosa serve votare ?
lunedì 13 giugno 2016
# s-ai: artists and machine intelligence interactions: the Ross' conjecture
<< "When we teach computers to write, the computers don’t replace us any more than pianos replace pianists," Goodwin suggests. "In a certain way, they become our pens, and we become more than writers. We become writers of writers." All this hints at a continuing collaboration of humans and technology in creative endeavors. >> Ross Goodwin
Ross Goodwin. Adventures in Narrated Reality. New forms & interfaces for written language, enabled by machine intelligence. Mar 18, 2016.
Jason Dorrier. An AI Wrote This Short Film—and It’s Surprisingly Entertaining. Jun 10, 2016.
FonT: << the computers don’t replace us any more than pianos replace pianists >> afferma Ross; ho idea che l'opinione di Ross circa i futuri rapporti tra AI-CPU e Umano siano illusori ...; un pianoforte nel suo stato fondamentale, di quiete, e' un oggetto inerte, anche se nelle sue parti in legno probabilmente "conserva" memoria di tracce dei suoni che sono stati (attraverso lui) generati, quindi del "colore" musicale dei pianisti che lo hanno utilizzato spesso; una AI-CPU non e', non puo' essere inerte; non solo "conservera'" tracce di storiche specifiche interazioni, ma sara' in grado di elaborare tali informazioni in tempo reale con le successive e di integrarle con immense banche dati; ho idea che il rapporto tra AI-CPU e Umano, almeno nel 99% dei casi, evolvera' in qualche forma non dissimile dai rapporti che inevitabilmente si instaurano tra infermiere psichiatrico e assistito solo parzialmente psico-neuro- autonomo; situazione questa che mi sembra del tutto differente dalla ipotesi di Ross circa l'umano << writer of writer >>; in ogni caso senz'altro si vedra' di quanto saranno efficaci nell'interazione "asimmetrica estrema" tra uomo e macchina "intelligente" i "moduli" a carattere "compassionevole" ... e se, eventualmente, si auto-assembleranno "moduli" con altre differenti specificita' ...